As many of you know, there is much hand-wringing going on in big law firms about whether their current economic model is viable. (I for one don’t think it is). Here is a good article about potential changes to law firm structures. A couple of quotes from a law firm consultant jumped out at me:
“Clients are unwilling to pay the high fees unless it’s extremely specialized work.”
“Firms have been run like a business in terms of pursuing profitability. They have been able to increase their rates every year, and that can’t happen anymore.”
Those thoughts certainly ring true for me. Why would a client pay a big firm (with all its overhead) for employment law counseling and litigation when a small firm or sole practitioner can provide the same quality at a lower rate? Same expertise, greater efficiency. Just asking!

No Comments on "The economics of law practice (and why small firms have an advantage over big ones)"
You must be logged in to post a comment.