As many of you know, there is much hand-wringing going on in big law firms about whether their current economic model is viable. (I for one don’t think it is). Here is a good article about potential changes to law firm structures. A couple of quotes from a law firm consultant jumped out at me:
“Clients are unwilling to pay the high fees unless it’s extremely specialized work.”
“Firms have been run like a business in terms of pursuing profitability. They have been able to increase their rates every year, and that can’t happen anymore.”
Those thoughts certainly ring true for me. Why would a client pay a big firm (with all its overhead) for employment law counseling and litigation when a small firm or sole practitioner can provide the same quality at a lower rate? Same expertise, greater efficiency. Just asking!



No Comments on "The economics of law practice (and why small firms have an advantage over big ones)"